Call for photos of our meetings and members! Everybody has pictures of pretty orchids, but for our
publicity and outreach activities, we need pictures of happy orchid enthusiasts, interacting with each other and their plants. Get out your cell phone,
snap some candid (unposed) shots, and email them to the web master. Thanks for your help!
Themes from Our Past
Here are some of the events and trends in the long life of South Coast Orchid Society that we can credit for our existence and our continued survival in
Long Beach, California. We weren't particularly careful to preserve our history, but enough survives in the form of newspaper clippings, published notices
in Orchid Digest and the AOS bulletin, Orchids, and in scattered newsletters, that we can see the outlines of how we managed to reach our 70th
Oil on Signal Hill!
The discovery of oil on Signal Hill (at the time, an unincorporated area just north of Long Beach) in 1921 changed everything. The
discovery led to the development of a new industry, an influx of people from many different backgrounds who saw an opportunity to make money, and the rapid
development of the entire area. Among the partipants was Samuel Mosher, whose Signal Gas and Oil Company, started with a loan of $4,000 from his mother,
eventually became such a giant that Mosher could afford
to relocate to the vast Rancho de los Dos Pueblos in Goleta, where he built what soon became the world's largest orchid business, Dos Pueblos Orchids, thus
bringing the orchid industry to the Santa Barbara area with Long Beach oil money! Another oilman from Long Beach was Paul N. Baker, our founder and first
president, who built two greenhouses next to his office and oil wells just off Long Beach Boulevard on 37th Street.
Another oilman, Arthur Falck, was a member
of the Petroleum Club in Long Beach (only a block away from Paul Baker's greenhouses and wells). When the Petroleum Club's new facility was completed,
Arthur's membership allowed him to reserve the premises for our annual awards banquet on January 28, 1957, and for many years to come.
World War II
Many of our members served in the armed forces in World War II. Quite a few were in the Navy, serving in the South Pacific,
and ended up in the Long Beach area at the end of the war. Wartime service and industries brought another wave of immigrants to Long Beach from other parts
of the country. Some of them had encountered orchids in the places where they had served during the war, such as Hawaii, the Philippines, etc.
The Postwar Boom
Southern California grew quickly after the war. The aviation industry, transitioning to commercial aviation, was one of them, but
the growth involved many other industries as well, such as manufacturing, construction, and of course, Hollywood. Good jobs supported our orchid growers and
their families. Like almost all immigrants from colder parts of the US, the new arrivals marveled at the sight of roses blooming in January, orange trees in
every back yard, palm trees, and very soon, all sorts of exotic "tropical" plants.
In fact, it wasn't long before a wave of Polynesian style swept through Southern California. For a time, it seemed everyone had a "Hawaiian" back yard with
banana trees and tiki torches. The Lafayette Hotel in downtown Long Beach opened an Outrigger Bar, and there was also a famous Outrigger Motor Hotel on PCH.
"Tiki culture" was everywhere. On The Pike, sailors congregated at the Polynesian-themed bars. In our early years, SCOS joyfully celebrated "the Islands"
with an annual luau, complete with grass skirts and hula competitions, all elaborately decorated with orchids.
High Fashion and Corsages
Women's fashions in the postwar era featured a wonderful elegance (which, however, almost everyone was happy to leave behind
a few decades later). Our early members found stunning tailored outfits at Dinel's Feminine Apparel in downtown Long Beach, and completed their ensembles with
custom orchid corsages, an art form perfected by our members. To support that style, there was also a thriving industry of orchids as cut flowers, although our
members preferred to grow their own. The corsages of the day featured graceful flowers with a minimum of ribbon, just enough to hide the stems. Our first
spokesmodel, Claire Hammel, an actual department store model, was featured in the local press on the occasion of our first holiday party in December, 1950.
Long Beach Parks Department
All the way back to our first known event, the 1950 holiday party, and in every newspaper clipping and newsletter since, our
monthly meetings, always on the fourth Monday of the month, unless that date was a holiday, have been held in Long Beach Parks Department facilities. Our
awards banquets were held at the Petroleum Club for many years, but everything else was in Parks Department community centers or clubhouses. We are not aware of
any other group in Long Beach with such a long and continuous association with the Parks Department.
Orchid Nurseries and Backyard Orchid Breeders
Among our early members were owners and employees of just about every orchid business in Southern
California. The same people were also usually members of the Orchid Society of Southern California (which met for some years at Plummer Park in what is now
West Hollywood; they now meet in Burbank), and we can guess why! OSSC, founded in 1947, has always met on the second Monday of the month, and SCOS has always met
on the fourth Monday, so that, no matter when your stunning new orchid bloomed, you would have a chance to show it off at one or the other of these two groups.
There were small orchid nurseries scattered all over Southern California, virtually all of them long gone. Our members, both professional growers and at least as
many amateurs from all walks of life, exchanged plants and advice at our meetings. They purchased the latest seedlings or won them in plant raffles.
What caught the attention of our members in the early days? We can see what they were up to from the accounts of our meetings and the awards that were published
in Orchid Digest and our newsletters. Cymbidium Lillian Stewart, produced by Fred Stewart, generated huge excitement, something Ernest Hetherington
later dubbed "Cymbidium fever". Someone even opined that Lillian Stewart was the world's most highly awarded orchid (not true, in fact). One measure of its fame
is that it even ended up on a North Korean postage stamp! Lavender Cattleyas were perhaps even more popular, especially the series of seedlings of what was then
Lc. (now C.) Bonanza. The next generation produced Rlc. Memoria Cripsin Rosales, among others. Other members worked on producing superior
clones of Cattleya species, such as C. mossiae. Paphs (then still called Cypripedium and Phals were not neglected, either, and the efforts
of our members were supported by the best laboratory technicians, some operating out of their homes, others working for the orchid nurseries.
learned how to pollinate orchids and then how to germinate the seeds on the newly-devised sterile media. A few of our members started their own flasking businesses
at home. An enterprising housewife from Canoga Park, Grayce Hecker, took advantage of a new invention, a plastic greenhouse, which she used first to grow what
turned out to be one of the best seedlings ever of C. Bonanza (she named her plant 'Pay Dirt' and insured it for $1,500), then produced a number
of fine hybrids from it. Every month, she and her husband, a restaurant owner, drove down to Long Beach for our meeting.
Multiple people in SCOS would sometimes
make the same cross — we know this happened in the production by at least 3 or 4 of our members, both amateurs and professionals, of the same cross that was
eventually registered as Rlc. Goldenzelle, which can be regarded as an SCOS group project — except that it was likely discussed at OSSC meetings by
the same people as well!
Orchid judging in Southern California goes back at least to September, 1949 at OSSC, which was then one of the founding chapters of
Orchid Digest Corporation. The standards and methods of judging were gradually refined by Orchid Digest, and later in collaboration with the American Orchid
Society. (In this collaboration, the same model of collective action applies, most of the people involved belonged to both organizations.) By October, 1954,
Orchid Digest Corporation was ready to extend judging to its other affiliated societies (SCOS became an Orchid Digest affiliate in 1953). Our members discussed
how to participate in this new program and voted to proceed. The first official judging at an SCOS meeting was held in December, 1954, and has continued
almost uninterrupted as a feature of our meetings ever since. At the end of 1967, an agreement between Orchid Digest Corporation and the American Orchid Society
was implemented, and all of the judges accredited by Orchid Digest Corporation became AOS judges as of January, 1968. Through our old newsletters and from notices
of awards published in Orchid Digest, we have a nearly complete record of the awards that were made at our meetings between 1954 and 1967. SCOS went on to
produce many notable judges who are still remembered today.
A Record of Service
Among our former and present members, many individuals contributed their time, funds, and energy to the development of the business
and hobby of orchids, both in Southern California and nationally. Some of our members have served as officers or directors of Orchid Digest Corporation, or of
almost all of the other orchid clubs in our area, or as directors of the American Orchid Society, or on the boards of local public gardens such as the Los Angeles
County Arboretum, Huntington Botanical Gardens, and others. They helped to raise money to support the activities of these organizations. Some traveled widely,
helping to create a network of orchid enthusiasts around the world. They organized national and international conferences. They worked together
in surprising ways, and they contributed to the development of Southern California as a haven for gardeners and gardens, without which the Los Angeles basin would
be a desolate place. We still have neighbors who plant only astroturf and concrete, and who instantly remove every tree when it becomes big enough to produce
some shade; nevertheless, Long Beach is full of exotic plants, vigorous trees, and orchids. During World War II, the national crisis required everyone to work
together, in the armed forces, in the defense industries, and on the home front. Service and working together became a way of life, and after the war ended,
the felt need for comaraderie and service remained. People joined all sorts of organizations. Our members had many interests other than orchids; they were active
in service organizations, professional societies, civic causes, charities, government, etc. That was the Southern California story — diverse origins, diverse
interests, together building a community we could call home. SCOS was a part of it, orchids were a part of it.
What's All This I Hear about Cambria Orchids?
Someone on Facebook claimed to be growing "Cambria orchids". From the picture, they were obviously talking about some sort of Oncidium intergeneric
hybrid, but where did the term "Cambria orchid" come from? We investigated. It turns out orchid hobbyists in many areas are familiar with this term,
even if they may have little idea of what it means. Here in Southern California, we don't seem to encounter this term, even at the grocery and home
improvement stores where orchids are marketed to the general public. But the situation appears to be much different in the rest of the world, especially
With some digging, we have found part of the story. We can tell you what the first "Cambria orchid" was, and how the term is used today. There's still
a big missing piece: How was the term introduced into commerce? By what company? When? Where? We would love to know!
The original "Cambria" was Vuylstekeara Cambria, a hybrid originated in England by Charlesworth & Co. in 1931. The cultivar 'Plush' has received
some major awards, such as FCC/RHS in 1967 and FCC/AOS in 1973.
The intergeneric name Vuylstekeara was created in 1911 for intergeneric hybrids obtained by the combination of Odontoglossum, Miltonia,
and Cochlioda. Many of you can see where this story is headed! There are no longer, officially, any Odontoglossums, because those that remained
after the first rounds of taxonomic upheaval have now been submerged into the genus Oncidium. The same thing has happened to Cochlioda. Meanwhile,
a large part of Miltonia was split out as Miltoniopsis, which has always struck us as pretty silly, since Miltoniopsis means precisely "looks
like Miltonia", and the species involved are exactly what we still think of when someone says Miltonia. So the name Vuylstekeara is no longer
found in official orchid names, and few people remember Charles Vuylsteke, the talented grower from Loochristi, Belgium who created legions of wonderful
Odontoglossum hybrids decades before there was any way to germinate orchid seeds except by sowing them on moss.
When we look more closely at the beginnings of Vuylstekeara, the complications quickly set in. Vuylsteke called his first tri-generic hybrid Insignis.
It made a sensation at the annual Royal Horticultural Society orchid show at Temple Gardens in 1911. There were several mentions of it in The Orchid Review
Some months ago a striking hybrid raised by M. Ch. Vuylsteke from Miltonia vexillaria ♀ and Odontioda Vuylstekeæ ♂ flowered in his establishment
at Loochristi, Ghent, of which a short notice and a coloured figure of a single flower appeared (Rev. Hort. Belge, 1910, p. 150, with fig.). As three
genera were involved, the question of a suitable name has been in abeyance, but now that the Report of the Committee appointed to deal with the question of the
nomenclature of multigeneric hybrids has appeared (see pp. 7, 8 of our last issue), we may proceed to apply the Committee’s recommendations to the present subject.
One clause reads: “Future generic hybrids (combining three or more genera) should be given a purely conventional name consisting of the name of some person
eminent as a student or grower of Orchids, terminated by the suffix ‘ara.’ ” The generic name now proposed for the present plant is, we think, highly
appropriate, for not only the hybrid but also the pollen parent are the creations of M. Vuylsteke, who has further raised a host of beautiful hybrid
Odontoglossums which now decorate our gardens. The specific name is also appropriate, and in conformity with the recommendations of the Committee, that it
“should be preferably in the Latin form.”
M. Vuylsteke has certainly raised a striking hybrid, which, from its composition, should develop into a handsome thing when the plant becomes strong. The
flower is fairly intermediate in character, with the expanded form of the seed-bearer, and a four-lobed lip. It measures just under two inches from tip to tip
of the petals, and the colour may be described as carmine-rose, with the lip slightly paler, especially towards the base, and the crest bright yellow. Nothing
is stated as to the habit of the plant. We hope to be able to examine it on some future occasion. Vuylstekeara will, according to the rule cited, include all
the combinations between the three genera Cochlioda, Miltonia, and Odontoglossum, and thus the name must also be applied to any future hubrids between Miltonioda
and Odontoglossum, and between Odontonia and Cochlioda, as well as to the two above mentioned.
However, when Vuylstekeara Insignis was awarded in 1914 and 1923 by the Royal Horticultural Society, the parentage was listed as Miltonia Bleuana x Odontioda
Charlesworthii. See Orchid Review 22:219 and 31:252. From the descriptions of this Insignis, it appears to be a completely different plant: (1914)
“A distinct and striking novelty, bearing flowers most like the Miltonia parent in shape, and the colour primrose yellow, with a cluster of light brown nearly
confluent blotches on the lower half of the petals, and the crest of the lip orange, with a zone of short brown lines around it. Exhibited by M. Firmin Lambeau,
Brussels.” (1923) “Award of Merit. Vuylstekeara insignis picta (Miltonia Bleuana x Odontioda Charlesworthii); from Messrs. Charlesworth & Co. A very much
finer variety than the original one flowered by Mons. Lambeau in 1914. In the variety picta the spike carried five flowers of medium size, the sepals and petals
rather narrow, but heavily stained with blood-red colour, the expansive labellum prettily tinged with varying shades of rose.”
This sort of nomenclatural appropriation seems to have been fairly common in that period, when multiple hybrids of different parentage were registered (even by the same grower!) under
the same name. The RHS orchid register shows three entries for Oncidopsis Insignis, formerly Vuylstekeara Insignis:
Oncidopsis Insignis (1911), registered and originated by Vuylsteke, parentage Oncidium noezlianum x Miltoniopsis vexillaria.
Oncidopsis Insignis (Vuylsteke), registered in 1911 by Vuylsteke, originated by Vuylsteke, parentage Oncidium noezlianum x Miltoniopsis vexillaria.
Oncidopsis Insignis (Lambeau), registered in 1914 by Lambeau, originated by Lambeau, parentage Miltoniopsis Bleuana x Oncidium Charlesworthii (1908).
It is to be noted that neither of the Oncidopsis Insignis registrations attributed to Vuylsteke matches the parentage published in 1911. One possibility
is that the entries in the modern registration database are themselves in error, a result of some sort of clerical mishap, since the parentage of Insignis and
also of its pollen parent Vuylstekeæ were very clearly given in Orchid Review. And, while we have award paintings of two different plants having
the parentage given for the Insignis (Lambeau) registration, neither one is apparently the original Insignis on which the hybrid genus Vuylstekeara was
based. We have not yet located a copy of the Revue Horticole Belge, where the only known illustration of Vuylsteke's plant is to be found.
For the parentage of Odontioda Vuylstekeae, the pollen parent of the first Vuylstekeara, we found the following account in Orchid Review
12:162 (1904): “The Temple Show furnishes another remarkable example of progress in hybridisation, and once more from the establishment of M. Ch. Vuylsteke,
of Loochristi. This exhibitor sent a very handsome hybrid between Odontoglossum Pescatorei and Cochlioda Nœtzliana, in which, curiously enough, the shape
of the Odontoglossum was largely reproduced, but the colour was a remarkable combination of shades of rose and salmon red, with some cream colour on the lip.
It was the sensation of the show, and received a First-class Certificate, to which the Council afterwards added the rare honour of a Silver-gilt Lindley
Medal—“for progress,” I think it might be defined. In any case it was highly appropriate, for the award was to be given preferentially for “excellence
in cultivation,” and it is probably this more than anything else which has enabled M. Vuylsteke to overcome the difficulties of bringing seedling Odontoglossums
through their early stages that has contributed so much to his success. I am forgetting the name given, which was Odontioda x Vuylstekeæ, the useful plan
of compounding a generic name from that of its two parents having been followed.”
A further account of the same show in the same volume calls it the seventeenth Great Annual Temple Show, opening on Tuesday, May 31, 1904 in the Inner Temple
Gardens, and notes that Odontioda x Vuylstekeæ was the sensation of the show.
We know exactly what this Vuylstekeæ was, for it was the subject of a separate article in Orchid Review the next month (12:209-211, July, 1904),
including a photograph and a detailed description of both of its parents. Moreover, the awarded flower was painted by Nellie Roberts, and the parentage shown
for this FCC matches that given above, but does not match any of the registration records shown in the current RHS orchid register database.
For Charles Vuylsteke, “The Man and the Hybrid Genus Vuylstekeara”, see Orchid Digest 58(3), 1994.
What should we call these hybrids today?
Odontoglossum pescatorei is regarded as a synonym of Odontoglossum nobile, which has since become Oncidium nobile. Cochlioda
nœtzliana was correctly spelled noezliana, and has since become Oncidium noezlianum. Therefore, Odontodia Vuylstekeæ is now
Oncidium Vuylstekeae, but Monsieur Vuylsteke appears to have registered two different hybrids under this same name. The one in question is (now)
Oncidium Vuylstekeae (1904); the other one, Oncidium Vuylstekeae (1905) is Oncidium Crispo-Harryanum x Vuylstekei.
Then what becomes of the original Vuylstekeara Insignis? The parentage is now transformed into Miltoniopsis vexillaria (because the species
that “look like Miltonias”, the literal translation of Miltoniopsis, have been split from Miltonia) x Oncidium Vuylstekeae (1904), and the
hybrid genus is now Oncidium x Miltoniopsis = Oncidopsis. The official abbreviation, by the way, is Oip. — look for it
Now we can consider the famous Vuylstekeara Cambria, and its highly awarded cultivar ‘Plush’. The parentage of Cambria is now listed as Oncidopsis
Rudra x Oncidium (originally Odontoglossum) Clonius. Clonius is Aquitania x The Czar, but then we lose the trail. RHS seems to have no record of
the parentage of Aquitania nor of The Czar. Aquitania was exhibited by Charlesworth & Co. at the Spring Show of the Royal Horticultural Society (the same show
formerly known as the Temple Show) in May, 1913, so we can be fairly sure it is one of Charlesworth’s hybrids. The Czar is even more obscure, as we were not
able to locate a clear record of it being exhibited or awarded. However, there is a famous print of Odontoglossum crispum Lindley var. Le Czar,
issued in 1898. “Le Czar” is not actually a French name, the French spelling is Tsar! Perhaps The Czar in the ancestry of Cambria is simply the same notable
specimen of Oncidium crispum illustrated by Lindley, a species now regarded (at least by some) as Oncidium alexandre. From the limited evidence
available, Cambria would seem also to be an Oncidopsis, just like Oncidopsis Vuylstekeae (1904).
We return to the Wikipedia and other sources that tell us a “Cambria orchid” is a commercial name for intergeneric hybrids involving Odontoglossum,
Oncidium, Miltonia, Cochlioda, and Brassia.
The Odontoglossums, at least those mentioned in the background of Cambria, have been submerged in Oncidium. The Miltonia has been split out
as Miltoniopsis (because, literally, it looks like a Miltonia). The Cochlioda in question is now also an Oncidium. There was no
Brassia in the ancestry of Cambria, but apparently there are today enough hybrids involving Brassia that resemble Cambria, so it is included as
well, on the assumption that some “Cambria” orchids might include ancestry of some Brassia species that have not yet been moved to some other genus, such
as Oncidium. Aliceara (=Brassia x the "real" Miltonia x Oncidium) and similar intergenerics seem also to be included.
From what we have seen of the ancestry of Cambria and some of the other Oncidium intergenerics that might be considered “Cambria orchids”, then, we suspect
they are mostly Oncidopsis or possibly Brassoncidopsis.
But how can we be sure? Researching plant names can be a full-time occupation if you have even a couple hundred plants. While there is a list of
intergeneric names on the web site of the
Royal Horticultural Society, we think the vast majority of the intergeneric names on the list are no longer valid for current registrations, because so many of
the genera have been reorganized or have vanished entirely. The RHS would be well advised to update the list to flag with “empty” intergeneric names. The RHS
also has a list of the
official abbreviations for the intergeneric names,
but, unfortunately, the abbreviations themselves are not in alphabetical order! (The list claims to be an “alphabetical list of standard abbreviations for
natural and hybrid generic names”, but in fact is is the generic names rather than the abbreviations that are in alphabetical order). There are now over 3,000
hybrid genus names and essentially no guidance about how they are to be used. Who will take up the challenge to produce an up-to-date and simple web site that
orchid hobbyists can use?
Me Too! — At least some web sites are using “Cambria Orchids” as a synonym for all Oncidium alliance intergeneric hybrids!
What is the future of orchid hybrid names? Has the current official system managed by the RHS become so cumbersome as to be beyond the comprehension of all
but the most highly-trained specialists? Will the apparently successful example of complicated hybrids marketed under a user-friendly name such as Cambria provide
the example for marketing other orchids? Will the parentage of orchid hybrids eventually disappear from the public record entirely, as the RHS registration
process becomes increasingly irrelevant for commercial horticulture, and even for a significant number of orchid growers who are not persuaded by the unprecedented
chaotic avalanche of baffling new orchid names? In the absence of active measures to form a consensus, we should not expect to see this situation improve in the
A selection of pictures labeled "Cambria orchid" from Facebook. How many do you recognize?
Blast from the Past: We Used to Make Orchid Corsages
During our first 20 years or so, orchid corsages, and dressing well generally, were a big part of our society. We might not realize that, if it were not for
the precious few newspaper clippings and newsletters that we have managed to recover from that time. When we held a big event, such as the annual luau (usually
in August) or the annual awards banquet (usually in January, and after 1957 at the Petroleum Club — a SCOS member was also a member there), the ladies of
South Coast Orchid Society would get to work making orchid decorations and corsages by the dozens. They were clever and enterprising. They figured out how to
make stylish, tasteful corsages out of all sorts of orchids: not just the usual Cattleyas and Cymbidiums, but also various Oncidiums, Dendrobiums, and anything else
that was available. In those days, too, the corsages our members preferred were all about the beauty of the individual flowers. The style of the times (1950's)
emphasized clean, elegant lines, so there was no need to add foliage, frills, little dried flowers and berries, lace, or any of the other additions that we
sometimes see today. Just a one flower, or a small group of flowers tasefully arranged, with only enough ribbon to hide the stems. Besides, anything more would
hide the tailored lines of the dress, jacket, or coat.
Thanks to Louis M. Boyle's wonderful and now incredibly nostalgic book, Out West: Growing Cymbidium Orchids and Other Flowers, the Story of El Rancho
Rinconada (1952, Los Angeles: Times-Mirror Press), we can tell you exactly how it was done.
Boyle included a short section on "Making a Corsage with Cymbidium Orchids":
"You will derive a lot of pleasure out of making and wearing Cymbidium orchid corsages from flowers which you have grown on your own plants. You can make
these corsages with any number of blooms you may desire from one to five or more. Most generally three blooms are used for this purpose.
"In making a corsage with Cymbidium blooms there are a few do's and don'ts which I think we should observe. In the first place, let your flowers do the
talking. Keep your arrangements simple, don't try to add fern or other foliage, it's a mistake. The ribbon you use must be harmonizing with your bloom
otherwise you will spoil the effect.
"Speaking of ribbon, use half-inch width, no wider, and remember in your arrangement you are wearing flowers, not ribbon. Two-tone ribbon is very attractive,
that is to say, ribbon which has one color on one side and another color on the other, the two harmonizing with the bloom you are using. This type of ribbon is
not generally found on the ribbon counters of department stores but is carried by florist supply houses.
"In addition to your ribbon you will require some No. 26 black annealed wire for wiring your blooms and floratape for covering the wire. You can if you wish
make up your corsage with just the floratape wrapping around the stems and wire. However, if you ribbon-wrap the stems and wire you will have a far more
"Before starting to make up your corsage be sure to harden the bloom off in water for several hours. Don't attempt to cut fresh flowers off your spikes on the plants
and make up a corsage for the bloom in the majority of cases won't hold up for any length of time. After you have hardened off your bloom you are ready to start
with your corsage.
"First, cut off the stem of each bloom you intend to use, leaving about an inch, then wrap the remaining stem with about a two-inch piece of floratape. This
will prevent the wire from cutting into the stem. Your wire should be twenty-six gauge, annealed, and about eight or more inches long—you can always cut
off any little excess if you need to. Take the wire and push this through the stem, as shown in the first sketch, about two inches, then bend the short end
downward and parallel with the stem. Now hold the flower in your left hand and be very careful not to injure the sepals, petals and other parts of the bloom while
you make several turns around the stem with the long end of the wire as shown in the sketch. This will leave about three inches of stem and wire.
"Now completely wrap this with floratape as shown in the third sketch. The length of ribbon required to wrap the stem and wire with a knot tie will vary. For
this reason, it is best to buy your ribbon in full rolls. In wrapping the stem with ribbon begin at the top and wind the ribbon downward over the florataped wire
and stem in the same manner as you did with the floratape. About one inch from the bottom make a loop knot and pull this downward and tight. Be sure that the knot
comes on the wire as shown in the sketch.
"After you have finished your individual blooms in this manner, combine them in your arrangement by twisting the ribbon-covered wires together.
"Make your ribbon bow as shown and tie this tight to your arrangement with a separate piece of ribbon. Finish the ends of each ribbon-wrapped wire as shown
in the sketch. With a little practice you will become perfect."
Don't Blame Thrips and Raccoons for Everything!
Oddly, raccoons and thrips have something in common: they are rarely seen, but they can damage our orchids. However, it doesn't seem fair that they get
blamed for the exploits of all the unseen culprits that trash our plants when we aren't looking. In all fairness, we have to rule out other causes. It turns
out there is enough blame to go around.
Raccoons really do get into mischief during the night. We have the trail-cam pictures to prove it! But there are many other critters who inhabit our Long Beach
gardens. Shall we count the ways? Skunks, rats, squirrels, possums, cats, dogs, coyotes, rabbits... Did we miss any? We know they are around, because we occasionally
see a live one in our gardens.
Squirrels definitely like to poke around our plants and occasionally nibble on them, but the other varmints are equally capable of gnawing,
overturning, and otherwise destroying our plants. Most of this botanical vandalism seems to happen at night.
It is tempting to try to trap or poison the offending critters. Here in California, the environmental dangers of traps and poisons have come to the
attention of the public and the state government, with the result that our options for controlling unwanted critters are limited. This is especially true for
what used to be called "rat poison": the most effective rat baits accumulate in the tissues of predators, thus endangering the whole food chain, as well as any of
our pets who happen to be predatory. Our famous Los Angeles mountain lion called P-22 has had several run-ins with rat poisons, in spite of state-wide attempts
to control those poisons.
The poisons that remain available to the public are apparently not very powerful. Something in our garden seems to eat those baits on successive days for
weeks at a time, as if some critter is getting fat off them. Even if we were able to eliminate the critters who live in our yards, there's nothing to prevent
the neighbor's critters from taking their place.
Long Beach is critter heaven. Our official city varmint is apparently the skunk, followed closely by the opposum, if
we can judge from the ever-present road kill on our major streets.
We don't often talk about thrips. Most of us don't know what they look like, have never seen one, and, worse, we lack the vocabulary. In hopes of
clarifying the matter, we investigated. Thrips is a Greek word (singular) meaning something like "woodworm". As the "scientific" name of an insect, it is
treated as a Latin noun (still singular). Because of the foreign origin of the word, the plural ought to be formed according to the rules for Latin nouns
borrowed from the Greek, so the most likely plural would be Thripses. However, the dictionaries also recognize "thrips" as both singluar and plural
in English. But that causes confusion in English when we have to talk about just one of them (although it can be argued that, in reality, they never occur singly);
we can find "thrip" on the internet as the "alternative singular" of "thrips". Take your pick, and feel free to introduce thrip, thrips, or thripses
into casual conversations with confidence.
The main problem with thrips, however, is that they are tiny. Many experienced orchid growers seem to blame thrips for just about any damage that can't
immediately be attributed to some other obvious cause, without actually seeing the thrips. Contrary to what many people seem to believe, thrips are not
microscopic! The adults are around 1 mm long — and they move! Think the thickness of a penny or a dime. They can be seen, and they can even be
photographed with your cell phone. The immature forms are much harder to spot, because they are pale and nearly transparent. Thrips go through a series
of molts before they reach the adult phase, and it is the immature forms that do most of the damage. The entire process, from egg to adult, takes around
2-3 weeks. However, if the infestation on a particular plant starts with just one batch of eggs, as seems likely, several generations will probably elapse
before the damage is noticeable, and by that time, adults should be visible. Significant damage without the presence of adult thrips seems more likely to
be the result of other causes.
Recently we noticed some damage to some little yellow Cattleya flowers. The scarring along the edges of the floral parts that touched each other looked just
like the damage we saw on a Cymbidium at an orchid club meeting, for which the ribbon judge invoked thrips. We were curious — got out the 10 X magnifier
(a souvenir from high school biology class). We saw minute dust particles, many of them black, but nothing that moved, and nothing resembling a thrip, live or
dead. Our verdict? Fine ash from the fires, smoke, and Santa Ana winds that had blown through a few days earlier! Ash contains, among other things, corrosive
metal oxides such as Na2O, K2O, CaO, etc., and any number of other combustion products. Add water, and you get lye.
Thrips seem to prefer other plants: They have attacked our Impatiens and Plumeria; the damage at first looked a bit like what spider mites do, but within
a day or two, the adult thrips were easily seen.
Once we find thrips, what are the options? We tried pyrethrin-based sprays, which are about as safe as you can get, but they don't seem to be very effective unless
every thrip is bathed in them. Systemic insecticides definitely work, but it may take a few days before the chemicals are absorbed by the roots and move up into the
leaves where the thrips feed. There are a couple difficulties with systemic insecticides. Most of them are NOT safe for indoor use; they should not come in
contact with your skin, nor should you breath the fumes or inhale the spray. Bayer markets a "2 in 1 Systemic Rose & Flower Care" that is easy to use, in the form of
slow-release granules that are scattered around the base of the plant. This formulation seems to control sucking insects such as thrips, and also spider
mites. However, the granules also contain a relatively small dose of 8-12-4 fertilizer. Just a light sprinkling seems to be enough to control thrips, scale,
and mealy bugs on potted plants. Another systemic insecticide that has been recommended by some orchid growers is Safari, not usually available in California,
and designed to be dissolved in water and sprayed on the plants or on the growing medium. If there is a biological control for thrips, we haven't found it.
We prefer to try one of the pyrethrin formulations first. Our favorite is called "Home Defense" (thanks for the tip, Agnes!), available at Home Depot and elsewhere
as a premixed spray. If that doesn't get rid of the bugs, then we can think about careful use of a systemic.
Bottom line here, let's be sure we really have a problem with thrips, before we bring out the strong chemicals.
Who Wants Round Flowers?
Recently we acquired a copy of Louis M. Boyle's Out West: Growing Cymbidium Orchids and Other Flowers (1952, Los Angeles: Times-Mirror Press), the
story of Boyle's amazing Cymbidium and "Old West" village on his retirement ranch, El Rinconada, near Ojai. Boyle died the next year, 1953, and the copyright
was never renewed, so this colorful bit of orchid and Southern California nostalgia is now in the public domain. The volume, richly illustrated, is a reminiscence
of his career in the sheet metal business, which was sold in 1939, after which he bought the rancho and caught a bad case of Cymbidium fever.
Writing around 1950, Boyle could see around him a confluence of fashion and horticulture. Post-war fashion seized on the Cymbidium flower, and especially
the arching spikes where each flower seemed to be caught in mid-flight, as the epitome of elegance. At the same time, orchid judging, following the lead of
the Royal Horticultural Society, was emphasizing full, round flowers. This trend in Cymbidium breeding was, however, not so far along; it was still possible
to give new Cymbidium hybrids names recalling birds, butterflies, and various sprites.
However, we couldn't help but notice a sort of disconnect between the Cymbidium flowers favored by orchid growers, even then, versus those used by professional
designers for interior fashion layouts and department store mannequins. The growers apparently wanted more flowers, standing high above the leaves, and fuller,
rounder petals and sepals. Moreover, the flowers were often photographed in isolation, almost as if the plant itself was not particularly relevant. On the other
hand, the fashion designers tended to use arching, flexible cut stems, on which the individual flowers were well separated, each hanging elegantly and not touching
the others, and emphasizing the slim, almost fragile profile of the petals, resembling birds in flight. There seem to be two very different concepts of "beauty" in
play here. This point can be appreciated by considering a few illustrations from Out West that we have included here.
From our viewpoint, the emphasis on round flowers seems to grow from looking very closely at individual flowers, in isolation from the rest of the plant. Viewed
in this way, a round flower may be very pleasing, a sort of exercise in color and symmetry. The flower with "more" is "better". Over the Cymbidium generations
(and likewise over the generations of Cattleyas, Odontoglossums—before RHS, in a fit of exasperation, did away with them—, Vandas, etc.), the plants
whose individual flowers had "more" were consistently judged "better", and were used in the next generation to produce even rounder, larger flowers.
But in the 1950's, designers did not seem to be particularly interested in round flowers. Women's fashions and interior design emphasized line in preference
to volume. This was the age of impossibly slim figures with perfectly tailored details that highlighted the graceful curves of the dancer, or the subtle lines
of Oriental brush painting. Oriental influences abounded, in fact, as if American tastes were seeking a calmer, more peaceful esthetic (Zen) after the uproar of the
war years. Unimproved Cymbidium flowers, such as Cym. eburneum and Cym. lowianum, provided exactly what the designers were looking for. Even
bigger flowers sometimes appeared in corsages, such as Cattleya hybrids involving what was then Laelia purpurata, the long, arching segments again
emphasizing line in preference to volume, as in the fashion plate that Art Chadwick has shared with us.
A point to consider: Suppose we substituted big round flowers in all the old fashion plates. Would the effect be the same? We think not! The individual
arching lines of the original flowers would be gone, we would see only a solid mass of indistinct flowers.
Not every aspect of "beauty" is easily quantifiable. Standards for orchid judging have historically relied on some sort of point system, based
where possible on objective measurements. That history was predictable: if orchid judging were to produce consistent and repeatable results, was there ever any
option but to rely on measurements? Perhaps the gentlemen of the RHS Orchid Committee should not be faulted for undertaking an impossible task, defining
beauty. In any event, under a measurement-based system, it is hard to see how larger, fuller, rounder flowers would not have the advantage.
However, if there are other kinds of beauty, and many of us believe there are, point systems and measurements would seem ill-equipped to assess them. Some of
us, let us admit it, are not drawn exclusively to fat, round flowers! Those old-time bird-like Cymbidiums still catch our eye with their subtle elegance.
Ultimately, there are many ideas of beauty. It is hard to improve on nature, and, as products and examples of nature ourselves, it is inevitable that we will
experience the many creations of nature, in all their diversity, as intrinsically beautiful. When it comes to orchids, point judging isn't all there is.
A Favorite Non-Awarded Flower from the Long Beach Judging Center
In December, 2018, we spotted a compact Cattleya seedling at the Long Beach Supplemental AOS Judging Center. What got our attention was the perfect "bisque"
texture of the flowers, as if they were formed from unglazed porcelain. Not a speck of dust, no irregularities whatever. The plant did not win an award that
night, but the cross, then labeled as Slc. Angel Eyes x Slc. Picotee Fire, has since been registered by Fred Clarke of
Sunset Valley Orchids as Rhyncatlaelia Ada Henriquez. In case you haven't been following the
wholesale revisions of the Cattleya alliance, Rhyncatlaelia is the official intergeneric name for Rhyncolaelia (used to be part of
Brassavola) x Cattleya x Laelia. You'll need to know the official abbreviation, too: Ryc. The subtle pastel shading, the gently
ruffled edges of the petals and lip, and the fine texture are a particularly elegant addition to the ensemble of "compact" Cattleyas for which Fred has become
The amazing parade of extraordinary orchids that show up at the judging center is a huge draw for South Coast Orchid Society meetings. Be sure to take a
peek in the back room at the next meeting. Visitors are always welcome in the judging center!
Best Orchid Flower We've Seen in an Long Time!
The annual show and sale staged by the South Bay Orchid Society at South Coast Botanic Garden isn't the biggest, but it is
still one of the most interesting for the opportunity to talk to some vendors we don't see very often, and, especially, for the quality of the plants that are
exhibited. We visited this year's show on September 14, 2019 and were stunned to see this plant, Rlc. Toshie Aoki 'Pizazz' AM/AOS, grown by long-time
SBOS member Bobby Ignacio from Carson.
Toshie Aoki cultivars turn up at shows fairly often. They vary widely; some cultivars lack the red flaring completely, others have varying degrees of flaring.
Flower size varies, too. We most often see flowers around 4 to 5 inches across. Toshie Aoki was created by the almost legendary Hawaiian orchid nurseryman
Masatoshi Miyamoto. Mr. Miyamoto was famous for his dislike of paperwork and correspondence, and he never registered most of his crosses. However, at some
point, Dr. A. G. Tharp, one of our past presidents, prevailed on Mr. Miyamoto to allow him, Tharp, to take care of the registration for several of Miyamoto's
hybrids, including Toshie Aoki, so that they could be submitted for AOS judging and get the awards they deserved.
The first of the Toshie Aoki's to be awarded was one exhibited at our own Long Beach judging center by Dr. Tharp, a cultivar he called 'Miniflares', which
achieved an AM/AOS, 81 points, on July 27, 1981, with flowers measured at almost 5 1/2" across. But the best of the cross has proved to be 'Pizazz', first
exhibited by Howard Starke, well-known as an orchidist in Honolulu, at the Hawaiian Exposition, on July 1, 1983, with flowers measuring nearly 5 3/4" across,
scoring 84 points and an AM/AOS. 'Pizazz' came back in 2017 for a second round, achieving 88 points when exhibited for AOS judging in Cincinnati by John
What distinguishes 'Pizazz' from the other cultivars of Toshie Aoki is the extent and subtle shading of the flares, and the exquisite form and presentation
of the flowers. We understand 'Pizazz' has been cloned, but we don't know if it can be found for sale at this time.
We posted this quick photo on Facebook as soon as we got home from the show, and within a couple days, it had been "liked" or "shared" by over 2,000
people, by far a new record for our little SCOS Facebook page! That was a big surprise, because Facebook is already overflowing with pretty orchid pictures.
We can only suppose that it was the combination of color and form that caused this unexpected reaction.
We had a chance to chat with Bobby about his Toshie Aoki. It came into his hands about ten years ago, as a party favor at the annual holiday party of
South Bay Orchid Society! Bobby reports that the plant is a slow grower, but it has remained healthy. It has survived all the pesky slugs and bush snails
that inhabit his outdoor growing area, under shade cloth—a familiar story for most of us in SCOS! This year, the plant developed two spikes, each
with a single flower, but on opposite sides of the plant. The one facing the sun developed very nicely. The other, facing a wall, wasn't as strong. When we
grow our orchids outdoors, we can control some things, such as the amount of light and water, but not others, such as the bugs and critters that wander through
our gardens when we're not looking. We all lose a few flowers, but the occasional grand success keeps us going!
Games Orchids Play: Floral Mimicry
One of the recent taxonomic upheavals among the orchids involves the Oncidium alliance. Doug Overstreet gave
us an overview of the situation in his talk on "My 10
Favorite Oncidiums" on July 22. In brief, what was left of Odontoglossum after previous upheavals has now, with the approval of the Royal
Horticultural Society, been lumped into Oncidium, and a number of species in that enlarged group have been transferred to other, much smaller genera
such as Gomesa, Trichocentrum, Zelenkoa, etc. Why was this done? The main reason is that new research, mainly investigations of genetic
similarity ("DNA technology"), demonstrated that some species were much more closely related to other genera than to the members of the genus where they had
previously resided, provided that DNA sequences can be assumed to be an impartial reflection of true evolutionary relationships. More exactly, the
assumption is that DNA mutations are generally random, and for the most part neutral with respect to gene function, and thus not themselves subject to
natural selection. The presence of a significant number of apparently random mutations that do not happen to affect the amino acid sequence of any protein,
in two different species, tells us that those two species share a common ancestor in some way, because the odds of a number of identical mutations occurring
by chance alone in two species simultaneously are extremely remote. When data of this sort were first produced, it was still possible that the investigators
had happened to choose very unrepresentative bits of DNA; today, many more and much longer DNA sequences (notably, the DNA corresponding to the
extremely highly conserved 5S ribosomal RNA) are available, and the results have to be considered seriously.
Perhaps the most significant study of the Oncidium alliance based on DNA similarities, and notably using highly conserved ribosomal DNA as well as
other important DNA fragments, was published in 2012. Conveniently, a web-based version of this paper, including numerous additional photographs, and highlighting
the most pragmatic solutions to the problems raised by the data, has been prepared by the same authors, on the web site of the
University of Florida Herbarium. The original paper is: Neubig, K.M., W. M. Whitten,
N. H. Williams, M. A. Blanco, L. Endara, J. G. Burleigh, K. Silvera, J. C. Cushman, & M. W. Chase. 2012. Generic recircumscriptions of Oncidiinae
(Orchidaceae: Cymbidieae) based on maximum likelihood analysis of combined DNA datasets. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 168: 117-146.
online version of the paper is also available. The decision of the authors to make their research freely available is greatly appreciated.
Meanwhile, research has expanded into new lines of inquiry, often (as a result of deepening concern about the extinction of endangered species)
dealing with the role that orchids play in nature ecosystems. The most intriguing findings for the Oncidium orchids is that many of their flowers
are strikingly similar to those in the family Malpighiaceae. More than a decade of reports on this topic have all reached similar conclusions: some
Oncidiums have flowers that are extremely similar to those of certain species from the Malpighiaceae family that occur in the same habitats. Based on
what is known about the way bees see (from the study of their optical receptors and pigments), these flowers are believed to show the same colors as
their Malpighian look-alikes, to a bee's eyes. But, where the Malpighian flowers provide "rewards" for the bees that visit them, in the form of oils
that the bees gather and use in the construction of their hives, the Oncidium flowers generally do not. However, there are other Oncidium
species that do provide oil "rewards", and they are the same type of oils as those produced by the Malpighiaceae.
It has to be emphasized that the research to date, and in spite of some very clever experiments, still has not produced large sample sizes and
definitive proof of what the bees are thinking about. But the conclusion seems inescapable, the resemblance of the flowers is remarkable.
What are the consequences if various Oncidiums and their relatives have found ways of attracting particular pollinators that also are attracted to the
Malpighiaceae? First, this sort of mimicry would only happen if both species occurred in the same area and flowered at about the same time. If a particular
type of bee already knew how to exploit the flowers of some species in the Malpighiaceae, such as the pink Malpighia glabra, and if a local Oncidium
species happened to bear flowers that the bees occasionally mistook for Malpighia, then the Oncidium might sometimes get pollinated. If
a particular combination of hereditary traits (genes) in the Oncidium helped the plant produce a flower with a better resemblance to Malpighia
such plants would be pollinated by these hypothetical bees more often, and so they would produce more seeds, and would give rise to more plants having
these favorable traits in the next generation. Over some very long time, possibly hundreds of thousands of years, repeated cycles of mutation and
bee-driven selection would produce Oncidium flowers with a greater resemblance to those of Malpighia.
Oncidium cosymbephorum (some treat this form as O. luridum, or place it in various other genera): Gustavo Carmona-Díaz and
José G. García-Franco. 2009. Reproductive Success in the Mexican Rewardless Oncidium cosymbephorum (Orchidaceae) Facilitated by the Oil-Rewarding
Malpighia glabra (Malpighiaceae), Plant Ecology 203: 253-261,
(abstract). The authors, working in the state of Veracruz, Mexico,
describe their approach as follows (from the abstract): "We evaluated the facilitation by M. glabra of the orchid's pollination for
natural and artificial clumps of O. cosymbephorum close to and far from M. glabra over 4 years. Two experiments were performed at five different
study sites to evaluate the effect of the presence and absence of M. glabra on the reproductive success of O. cosymbephorum. In experiment 1,
we recorded fruit set production in natural and artificial monospecific clumps of the orchid, and in natural and artificial heterospecific clumps of
O. cosymbephorum and M. glabra. In experiment 2, we recorded the fruit set of O. cosymbephorum at different sites where individuals
grow in monospecific clumps, both before and after cultivated individuals of oil-producing M. glabra had been planted in their vicinity. Both experiments
showed that the reproductive success of O. cosymbephorum was greater in the presence of M. glabra than it was in its absence."
Oncidium sphacelatum: Robert W. Pemberton. 2008. Pollination of The Ornamental Orchid Oncidium sphacelatum By the Naturalized
Oil-Collecting Bee (Centris nitida) in Florida, Selbyana 29: 87-91,
(full article available online). The author discovered an individual
of Centris nitida visiting the native shrub Byrsonima lucida in a residential garden, and this particular bee had orchid pollinia stuck to
its head. The source of the pollinia was apparently to be found in several hanging baskets of Oncidium sphacelatum in the same garden. The author
then undertook a systematic program of observations of the orchid specimens over the course of their flowering. The main visitors to the flowers were
the Centris nitida bees, and at least some of them did succeed in dislodging the pollinia of the flowers they visited, and in at least one case,
carrying off the pollinia stuck to the front of its face. Seed set was observed, roughly one capsule per spike, in the orchids visited by the bees, while
control specimens of O. sphacelatum, bagged to shield them from pollinators, did not produce any capsules, thus demonstrating that the capsules on
the plants visited by the bees were not the result of self-pollination or apomixis. While Byrsonima lucida has pinkish flowers, and O. sphacelatum
has bright yellow flowers, that is not necessarily how the bees see them! There may be more to this story. The bees apparently prefer flowers that resemble
those of the Malpighiaceae, without being overly fussy about their color. At the very least, this report demonstrates that Centris nitida does
visit Oncidium flowers even outside its normal habitat, in spite of the absence of any reward for doing so, and that these visits can result in
And that is certainly what we see today! Pink Oncidiums with a marked resemblance to the flowers of Malpighia glabra are indeed found
together. There are similar observations involving at least some of the yellow Oncidium species (but most of these are now in other genera), and
the Malpighian genus Stigmaphyllon (vines with yellow flowers that look very much like Oncidium, and usually known in the horticultural
trade as "Orchid Vines"!).
The alert reader will have realized that each case of floral mimicry needs three players: the two flowers, and at least one pollinator whose behavior
the two flowers are influencing. Plants, of course, don't move very far, but bees can and do move around. Climates change, habitats change, and so one
of the three partners in this little dance must have sometimes disappeared. Some other pollinator, perhaps a different species of bee, may have come along
and replaced the first bee species, and the newcomers may have had different flower preferences. We have to imagine that the co-evolution of flowers and
the bees that pollinate them must have taken many unexpected and unknown turns over a very long period, coupled also with changes in climate, the uplift
and later destruction of mountains, the changing course of rivers, and all the other components of a real tropical ecosystem.
The Players: It takes 3 to do the floral mimicry dance ~ ~ ~
The model: Several genera in the Malpighiaceae have been implicated, including various species of Stigmaphyllon (yellow flowers), Malpighia
(mostly pink flowers), and likely others, such as Tetrapteris (yellow flowers with orange or red highlights). Essentially the same floral architecture
and colors occur in most species from this family, which consists mainly of tropical vines and trees.
The mimic: Various species in the Oncidium alliance with yellow or pink/purple "dancing lady" flowers.
The pollinator: Various species of cute little stingless bees. The genera Centris and perhaps Euglossa have been mentioned. They have been
observed gathering oil and pollen from many species, but they seem to favor the Malpighiaceae. What do they do with the "floral oils" that they gather?
Various theories have been advanced: Perhaps they use it to waterproof their nests? Or they use it as an ingredient in making little cakes of pollen? However,
many of the Oncidium alliance flowers that are involved in this mimicry do not bear "floral oils", so the pollination strategy is often termed
"rewardless" or even "deceitful" mimicry. The bees are fooled into visiting the rewardless orchid flowers, and may happen to carry away pollinia that could
be deposited on the next orchid flower that they visit while looking for the real oil "rewards" offered by the similar flowers of the Malipighiaceae.
But the story of the co-evolution of flowers and their pollinators has been happening for millions of years, ever since the appearance of the
angiosperms ("flowering plants"). What is new in this small chapter of the story, is that it no longer makes sense to reduce the evolutionary mechanisms
to the case of one flower interacting with one pollinator. Rather, the existence of mimicry in flowers implies interactions of multiple flowers with
For the problem of how we think about the species of the Oncidium alliance, how they are related to each other and what they should be called, the
story of floral mimicry provides a possible explanation for the situation that led to the reorganization of the genus Oncidium: multiple species of flowers,
each finding ways to exploit the tastes of the available pollinators. If multiple species, having a general similarity, were to interact with one or more species
of pollinators that already had a preference for the flowers of the Malpighiaceae, it would be possible, after many cycles of mutation and natural selection, to end
up with multiple Oncidium species that had each found a way to produce a mimic flower, good enough to fool the bees at least some of the time. Apart from
their floral anatomy, these species would be no more closely related than any two randomly-chosen species from the Oncidium alliance, even though their
flowers were very similar. Thus we could end up with a disparity between a classification based on floral anatomy, compared with a classification based on
genetic similarity. And that is essentially what seems to have happened. The orchids are teaching us about how life works.
But science is always looking for the next question, the next complication. Here's one that might need to be considered: horizontal gene transfer.
We know that many orchids in the Oncidium alliance can interbreed and produce fertile seedlings. They rarely are caught doing this in nature, but if it happened
even once, under the right circumstances, we might end up with a natural population that got some of its floral mimicry genes from an unexpected source, some
distantly related species that might not even exist today. Thus, if we posit the existence of even a little interbreeding over the long span of evolutionary
history, we might have to rethink our conclusions. In fact, something like this is now believed to have happened during the course of human evolution:
Neanderthals, Denisovans, and no one knows how many other early relatives of modern man that apparently interbred occasionally with "modern" humans in
the very distant past. Individual genes in plants could well turn out to have origin stories of their own. In plants, also, there are "jumping genes", plasmids,
chloroplast DNA, viruses, etc. that might have served as vectors to introduce genes from one plant into another.
In many parts of Latin America, Sobralia is a common plant along the roadsides. Along the highways in Costa Rica, the roadsides are mowed periodically,
but Sobralia, usually with either white or lavender flowers, grows back quickly, along with the usual grasses, Impatiens, ferns, etc. Travelers
often notice these big, cheerful flowers that look a lot like Cattleyas, even though they really belong with Elleanthus in the Maxillaria tribe. Away from
the roadsides, at least 150 species of Sobralia have been described from near sea level to at least 8,000 ft, in a variety of habitats. They include
"the world's tallest orchid", Sob. altissima from the mountains of Peru; one of these plants was measured at over 44 ft. in height, although they are usually
"only" about 20 ft. There are also some relative miniatures, about a foot tall, such as Sob. callosa. In between, surprising diversity. Perhaps this
another of those "something-for-everyone" orchids that we should all be growing.
Sobralia grows terrestrially, for the most part. The species and hybrids that we find at our local orchid nurseries (Andy's Orchids has a group of
them near the entrance) appear to grow happily outdoors in big tubs of bark and perlite, and when they get overgrown, the canes can be cut down and new ones will quickly
sprout. The canes keep their leaves throughout the year, until the cane finally dies back after several years. Repotting isn't as difficult as you might
expect, it does not seem to be necessary, or even desirable, to remove the old medium (some species don't like to have their roots disturbed). Rather, just
clean up the root ball and gently remove or hose off anything especially rotten, and then place it back in a suitable pot and fill in with fresh medium as
you would do with any other orchid. The roots are usually large and vigorous, and new canes sprout easily from the underground stem. They like a lot of water
during the growing season.
Flowers are produced usually one at a time (clusters in some species) at the ends of the canes. The flowers often last just a day or two, but this varies
with the species. Flowers of many species are unexpectedly large! Many colors are available, mostly in the white-pink-lavender range, but also some yellows,
contrasting lips, etc.
The main drawback for growing Sobralias in our area seems to be that, when they bloom, they are too big to transport to our meetings and judging
center. Nevertheless, someone manages to bring in a specimen plant from time to time. Another difficulty is that they can take up a lot of space! With a
little thought and experience, however, most of us can probably grow a few of them, almost as a hedge along a fence or wall, or as a screen between
sections of the garden. A big plant with many canes will likely produce a few flowers, one at a time, on several canes, off and on through the summer. For the
rest of the year, the canes are not unattractive, the bright green leaves are pleated and well arranged.
Besides the species available at Andy's Orchids, and the hybrids offered by Cal-Orchid, another notable source is Ecuagenera, based in Cuenca, Ecuador. Owner
Pepe Portilla offers over a dozen species on his web site, and he brings a wide selection of orchid plants (all bare-root) to the major sales and shows in
Southern California (usually the shows at Santa Barbara, the Huntington show, and the Fascination of Orchids sale).
Enter the taxonomists: Sobralia has not escaped their attention! The genus has long been divided into "sections" (with Latin names). Recently,
a study that included DNA sequence analysis (of only 3 genetic markers, however) produced evidence that the section that includes the type species Sob.
dichotoma (the one photographed at Machu Picchu, at the top of this article) is quite dissimilar to the other sections (Przemyslaw Baranow, Magdalena Dudek,
and Dariusz L. Szlachetko, 2017, Brasolia, a new genus highlighted from Sobralia (Orchidaceae), Plant Systematics and Evolution 303:853-871).
One option for how to proceed in the face of this evidence would be to follow the normal rules of plant taxonomy, and leave the section including Sob.
dichotoma alone, and then to transfer the remaining 140 or so species to a new genus Cyathoglottis, the oldest available synonym of Sobralia.
However, observing with masterful understatment that "such a reorganization could cause confusion", another proposal, originally made by Dressler, was to designate
another species as the type for Sobralia, so that the bulk of the species would remain under that name. In the article cited, we read, and apparently this
statement was not intended to be ironic, "Unfortunately, no further nomenclatural changes within the genus have been made since the publication of the proposal
by Dressler et al. (2011)". Accordingly, these authors have advanced the notion that the type section of the current Sobralia should be split out
under Brasolia, one of the old synonyms of the genus Sobralia, and, if the proposal were approved by the Nomenclature Committee for Vascular
Plants in 2017, everybody could go home happy. Whether the decision was actually accepted, we haven't yet discovered, the report from that meeting has
not yet appeared on the internet.
The orchids are now a playground for the taxonomists, but that is not necessarily a bad thing. True, the names change faster than anyone can keep up with
them, possibly including other taxonomists, and if these changes are done too quickly, they may have to be undone (as has happened with a number of taxonomic
adventures among the birds). But it is probably better that all available species are studied by modern methods. Without active study, it is entirely possible
that no one will realize how close some of them may be to extinction from habitat loss, or just how rare some specimens in captivity may actually be.
Orchids By and For Our Members
We want to announce a new project: a web page devoted to the orchids that have been created by South Coast Orchid Society members, or for which they
achieved awards, or that were named after them (either the grex or the awarded cultivar). When we started digging into our history, it didn't take long
to notice how many of our members learned how to create new orchid hybrids, and how to grow them with such skill that they won major awards. We began to
notice, also, that quite a few of our members have had hybrids or cultivars named after them. But what has become of those plants? Do they still
exist? Can we find them? Can we even find pictures of them? A recent visit to the Batchman family's nursery at Solana Beach, Casa de las Orquideas,
settled the question. What was that big, floppy white Cymbidium on the other side of the shade house? It was Woody Wilson — a familiar name! Was
it the same Woodrow C. "Woody" Wilson who was President of South Coast Orchid Society in 1960 and 1961? Yes! And there was a story to go with the
Woody served in many capacities in SCOS, including at least Treasurer and President, and then he got interested in judging. He worked his way up through
Associate Judge to Accredited Judge, and made the transition (at the beginning of 1968) from Orchid Digest judging to American Orchid Society judging along the
way. He was a tall, imposing man who took these things seriously and wasn't shy about expressing his opinions. His opinions, according to the Batchmans,
were well founded and largely respected. However, when Loren Batchman brought in his new hybrid Cymbidium Woody Wilson 'Ann' for judging (that would have been
around 1993), he found that some of the judges were reluctant to deal with anything named "Woody Wilson"! Nevertheless, this cross, Cym. Loren's Treasure
x Solana Beach, produced some great plants. Loren thought it was the right one to name after Woody, a white Cymbidium for a guy with a stunning head of
white hair. The clone 'Ann' is named after Woody's wife, who was also a member of SCOS. Nancy Batchman told us this plant is hard to exhibit, because the flower
spikes want to droop, and the plant itself is much too big to grow safely in a hanging basket. But it's gorgeous!
There are other plants named after our members that are still in collections. John Hanes was SCOS President in 1955 and 1956. He and his wife Elva ("Tommie")
were important in the early history of judging standards, Orchid Digest, and the American Orchid Society. They also produced some excellent Paphiopedilum
hybrids, which were usually known as Cypripedium at that time. Eventually they ran a small business from their home in San Gabriel, "Hanes Orchids of
Distinction". Two important hybrids created by Rod McLellan & Co. were named after them, John Hanes (a big, round red) and Tommie Hanes (a big, very round green).
It's going to take some work to pull all the information together. We're not even sure what form the web page will eventually take. There will also be a
separate web page with information about our past presidents. One plant at a time, however, our collection of members and their plants will grow! Do you have a
plant that is named after one of our members? Do you have a plant that one of our members created? Have you got pictures of either the members or their plants?
We would like to hear from you! Contact the web master or talk to any of the officers at the next meeting!
A Surprising Connection: Signal Hill Oil and the Santa Barbara Orchid Industry:
A chance conversation at the Long Beach City College horticulture resource fair revealed an unsuspected connection between Signal Hill and the development
of the orchid industry in the Santa Barbara area.
Oil was discovered, in spectacular fashion, on June 23, 1921, when a test well on Signal Hill (then an unincorporated area on the north edge of Long Beach)
turned out to be a gusher. A struggling farmer in Rivera (it hadn't yet become Pico Rivera) understood the potential of this discovery. He sent away for a
government pamphlet on the method of extracting oil and gasoline, borrowed $4,000 from his mother, and founded a company, Signal Oil and Gas Co., that eventually
became a huge enterprise. The farmer was Samuel Barlow Mosher, born in 1892 in Carthage, NY. He had contracted polio as a child, which left him with a
"withered leg" (as he wrote on his World War I draft registration form), but he was strong and resourceful. He already had a degree in agriculture from the
University of California at Berkeley. He was soon to be know as "the little giant of Signal Hill".
His businesses multiplied and thrived. Some of our members may remember filling up at a Signal Gas Station. In 1942, he purchased Rancho los Dos Pueblos
in what is now Goleta, just up the coast from Santa Barbara. There he
built up a large estate from which he could see some of his oil wells along the coast.
The rancho was soon in the cattle business and the nursery business. One of
businesses created from the rancho was Dos Pueblos Orchid Company. In short order, he had several acres of Cymbidiums under glass. His staff developed methods
for bringing Cymbidiums to market several years sooner than was the norm at the time, with numerous innovations for orchid culture and greenhouse management.
The company was soon the largest orchid company in the world!
Mosher wasn't the first person to grow Cymbidiums in the Santa Barbara area. There were many amateur growers, and at least one or two nuseries were already
selling Cymbidiums (notably a nursery run by Bert Kallman), but there was nothing on such a large scale. It was Dos Pueblos Orchid Company that turned orchid
growing into an industry in Santa Barbara.
Mosher died in 1970. Dos Pueblos continued as a business perhaps as late as 1996. And that is how Signal Hill oil money created the orchid industry in Santa
Barbara! Mosher's other adventures are at least as remarkable. With further research, we hope to bring you some of them.
The forest of oil derricks is long gone. You have to know where to look to get even a vague idea of what Long Beach and Signal Hill looked like during the
oil boom. But there were oil wells and orchids side by side in Long Beach when South Coast Orchid Society was founded in 1950, as revealed in this account about our
first president, published only a year earlier:
Orchid Digest, September-October 1949, p. 473-474:
CALLING ON PAUL N. BAKER
J. P. Spitzel
We are headed for a visit with Mr. Paul N. Baker, one of our newer members. Turning off Long Beach Boulevard at 37th Street, we are rather startled to find
ourselves at the very edge of a busy oil field. Oil wells pumping, over there a typical little field office—yes, right here in the midst of it all, two
greenhouses. Mr. Baker’s greenhouses are not at his residence, but right among the oil wells. At first this seems rather startling, but when Mr. Baker
explained that his backyard at home is too small to indulge in his hobby, and that on the other hand he has quite a bit of time during the day to take care
of his plants, it all seems rather simple.
As we expected, we found Mr. Baker repotting and he was making a splendid job of it. His hobby dates back to 1942. His first collection consisted of a
dozen miscellaneous cymbidiums, seven laelias and three stray “catts.” Greenhouses were not available during the war, but there was a nice peach tree in the
back yard, so the peach tree pinch-hits for a greenhouse and evidently fills the bill well. Such little inconveniences as moving all the plants into the
kitchen when a cold spell was predicted did not deter nor discourage an enthusiast like Paul Baker.
Early in 1948 Mr. Baker built his first 10 x 12 greenhouse. Within a matter of months it proved too small and by November of the same year a second
greenhouse, slightly larger than the first one, was erected. Now, six months later, plans are under way for another of generous size.
Overhead lath is used in lieu of whitewash. The plants look well. Mr. Baker has his own ideas on potting. He believes in ramming osmunda down real
hard in the lower half or two-thirds of the pot, the balance is potted medium hard. He waters every week or ten days, soaking the material well; sprays
overhead on every sunny day. He thinks that by pursuing this method of watering he can lengthen the life of the osmunda to three years instead of the usual
two. In line with this thought he advocates the use of larger pots to allow for three years’ growth. Some of the mature plants and seedlings are potted
in Ashton’s mix. He likes this mix so well that he is experimenting with this material by potting in a combination of half osmunca and half Ashton’s mix.
Another of his experiments is potting the plants in Yucca Cactus Fibre. The cactus fibre is a by-product of water conditioning manufacturers. He claims
root action is exceptionally good. Mr. Baker is also attempting to raise the carbon dioxide contents in the air of his house by letting a layer of yucca
fibre decay under his benches. He hopes to raise the CO2 to 0.04 of 1%. Normal is supposed to be 0.03 of 1%.
Whenever possible, rainwater is used for watering the plants.
Only one plant was in bloom; an unidentified seedling blooming for the first time, beautiful, dark reddish color, with five flowers.
We thanked Paul Baker for having so generously expounded his theories for the benefit of the readers of the ORCHID DIGEST and we promised to drop in
sometime again soon.
In Appreciation: No-Name Orchids:
The orchids sold at grocery stores and home improvement centers frequently lack labels. As orchid hobbyists, we like to collect orchids that are properly
identified, if for no other reason than that proper orchid identification is required to win awards! Beyond the vanity aspect, a proper label helps us
figure out what the plant needs for best growth and flowering, and we can use the label to work out the story of the plant itself: where it came from, who
grew it, and how it got to us.
Nevertheless, some of these nameless plants are remarkable for their stamina and vigor! There's nothing wrong with keeping them in your collection if the
flowers give you pleasure!
Here's a nameless Oncidium, very likely a species, that was sold at Trader Joe's about 20 years ago. We're still working out what it needs to flower
reliably (misplacing it behind other plants doesn't seem to be what it wants). It's not spectacular as Oncidiums go, but still very nice.
Some of the Cymbidiums that turn up at Home Depot are amazing. There are a handful of clones in clear, bright colors, with strong, upright spikes (well suited
for traveling around in a big truck). The flowers are well-arranged and last for weeks. The price is usually around $20. Here's a green one with a nice
contrasting lip, which has remained vigorous for at least 15 years.
Both of these plants have survived all sorts of neglect, bad weather, attacks by bugs and critters, etc. They come back strong every year. They surprise
us each time with cheerful flowers when we need them most. Yes, we're going to keep them!
Everybody Loves Rhyncattleanthe Love Sound:
Every so often a Cattleya hybrid catches everyone's fancy, leading to a flood of new hybrids as orchid growers try to create something even better.
So it was with Cattleya Bow Bells (Black & Flory, 1945), Cattleya Bonanza (Bracey, 1949), and Cattlianthe Chocolate Drop (Stewart, 1965).
One of the latest stars of the orchid world is Rhyncattleanthe (Rth.) Love Sound, registered in 1987 by Dogashima, and now the parent of at least 154
Dogashima Orchid Sanctuary, which had a research center, has now apparently morphed into Orchid Resort Dogashima, on the scenic Izu peninsula in Japan. At least
a few years ago, the research center was active in the field of orchid micropropagation. The cultivar name 'Dogashima' is attached to about a dozen other hybrids
Whether all the cultivars of Love Sound are the result of a single cross, or if instead there have been one or more remakes, we don't know. Love Sound
itself is C. briegeri (formerly a "rupicolous Laelia", sometimes a Sophronitis, and then briefly and perhaps still, for some people who really
like double letters, Hoffmannseggella briegeri — but now, after the latest taxonomic upheaval, a Cattleya)
crossed with an extremely complex Rhyncattleanthe Bouton D'Or, which has a total of 14 species in its pedigree, including three more from the old "rupicolous"
Love Sound cultivars are mostly yellow with lighter shading along the middle of the petals, with deeper tones and often also a reddish blush on the lip. Some
have subtle reddish flares or shading on the margins of the petals and sepals. The form is usually good, and the flowers last well. As a parent, Love Sound
transmits these characteristics to most of its progeny.
Among the Love Sound hybrids, of course, is the inevitable cross with Cattlianthe Chocolate Drop, which turned out
quite nice, with a total of 13 AOS awards so far, Rhyncattleanthe Brassy Gold. While most of the hybrids have produced yellows or peach tones, often
with a red lip, there have been some exceptions. Several have produced semi-alba seedlings (e.g., Hsinying Catherine). Izumi Charm (two awards) came out with
very pale yellows and a deep crimson lip. And we can't leave out Martha Clarke, now with at least 10 awards, and a wide
range of hot colors, flares, and extremely full petals.
The Love Sound hybrids are still coming to market. Fred Clarke's current seedling list includes many new first and second generation Love Sound hybrids. With
a proven record of excellent plants from this line of breeding, we will probably hear more from those seedlings in coming years. Who will find the next
big winner? Maybe you?
Here are some of those plants that got past hybridizers so excited:
A Blast from the Past: 1966 — Fifth World Orchid Conference, in Long Beach!
Have there ever been, or will there ever be, as many orchids in Long Beach as there were in April, 1966? Luckily for us,
our President at that time was Lloyd R. De Garmo, highly qualified to edit the fat volume of Proceedings of the conference, and get them
published by the end of the year. There was also some excellent press coverage. But a couple of pictures reveal the scope
of the event, organized largely by the Orchid Society of Southern California and our own society, running from April 14 to April 17, 1966 at the
Long Beach Arena. The entire floor of the arena was filled with elaborate exhibits, viewed with enthusiasm by well-dressed
Off camera, there were important seminars. It was a significant time in the history of the orchid business.
Mericloning had only recently been applied successfully by orchid nurseries (the first one out of the gate was
Vacherot et Lecoufle, in France). New developments in biology and technology were just beginning to be applied to
orchids. Some of the presenters went on to distinguished careers in orchid biology, among them our friend Dr. Harold Koopowitz.
The plants, too, were undergoing rapid development. Many of the familiar names in orchid hybridization had their nurseries (or in some cases their
personal greenhouses) in Southern California. Our members bought seedlings of the latest hybrids from these growers for as little as $2.50 (we
know this from their advertisements in the SCOS newsletter), and sometimes grew them into fabulous specimen plants.
The big orchid party had its own beauty queen, Donna Ewing, of Long Beach. We're still looking for more information about her and about the party
itself. So far as we know at this time, Donna was not an orchid grower, but she clearly enjoyed posing with an armload of the latest Cymbidiums. In
those days, everyone dressed for orchid shows! It was a big occasion. It has to be said, too, that while the price of commercially available
orchid seedlings was very reasonable, top quality plants were still only available as divisions. Cloning was in its infancy. Unless you knew someone
who had a division to spare, acquiring an awarded plant could be an expensive proposition. Or, you could buy up seedlings from the latest crosses,
baby them along for several years, and maybe end up with something amazing, as several of our members have done over the years.
Certainly all the local growers were in attendance, famous names such as Ernest Hetheringon. Our friend Dr. Harold Koopowitz presented a paper
in the lecture sessions, and we understand our long-time member Dr. Norito Hasegawa was inspired to start growing orchids himself after viewing the
exhibits. We would very much like to hear from anyone else who was there! A copy of the official program ended up in the collections of The
Huntingon. We hope to have a chance to copy it soon. Many of the local orchid hobbyists and growers helped with the logistics as well: Clark
Day, Jr. and Jerry Rehfield led the transportation committee! Rita and Herbert Crothers handled plant registration. Ernest Hetherington was in
charge of local publicity. Paul Gripp organized tours to the nurseries in Santa Barbara. Former SCOS President John Hanes served as the Vice
Chairman for Judging. Mrs. Hanes worked on program planning and facilities (that would have included arrangements with the Long Beach Arena as well
as the Lafayette Hotel). Charles Bowman, SCOS President in 1958, 1959, and again in 1969, was the liaison between the Conference organizing
committee and local societies.
As time permits, we will copy the list of judges who were pressed into service for this event as well. A total of 127 plants received awards,
the details of which were included in the Proceedings. The top award by far went to Andy Yamamoto of Culver City for Cymbidium Orchid
Conference ‘Green Light’ (Cym. Sola x pumilum album), a staggering 91.32 points. Perhaps not surprisingly, given the season when the
Conference was held, most of the awards were for Cymbidiums. There were no Paphiopedilums, because at that time they were still called
Cypripedium in horticulture! The awards also included plants that had traveled great distances to participate in the exhibits, including Vandas
from Singapore and Malaysia, and a selection from the Oncidium alliance exhibited by Vacherot & Lecoufle, from France.
We are indebted to Ron McHatton of AOS for an explanation of how the World Orchid Conference awards work: These events don't actually use AOS
judging standards, and there are normally judges from all over the world who volunteer or are invited to judge the exhibits, or to judge individual
plants. However, there is no uniform set of standards used for World Orchid Conference judging, and therefore the awards, while clearly significant,
can't be directly compared with those made under official AOS standards by AOS judges. Hence, we don't find the World Orchid Conference awards listed
in the AOS awards database. Nevertheless, the flowers that caught the judges' eyes in 1966 were clearly some excellent plants! We have started
searching for pictures of the awarded plants and will add our results here at a later date!
There was some interesting press coverage, too — Ernest Hetherington came through with a nice teaser in the Los Angeles Times
on April 10, 1966, the Sunday before the Conference, under the headline "Orchids to See and to Grow".
Orchids to See and to Grow
This atrium is both a proof and a reminder—proof that you can have a tropical garden in your home and a reminder to go to the show which starts
Thursday at the Long Beach Arena in connection with the World Orchid Congress. Two things are essential if you want to grow orchids in your home:
humidity and a soft light. These are provided here by complete enclosure, like the old-fashioned bell garden, and by a sunshade of translucent
plastic. The result is more than just a huge plant container. There is an illusion of a fine garden vista from every room which look into the atrium.
We suggest that you go to the show in Long Beach because the Congress is a kind of orchid World Series. The show opens Thursday, April 14, and
closes Sunday, April 17. Hours are 10 a.m. to 10 p.m. The Congress, at the Lafayette Hotel, meets from April 15 to 19. More than 2,000 growers
from throughout the world are expected for the meetings. The show is sponsored by the Orchid Society of Southern California, The American Orchid
Society and the Royal Horticultural Society of England. Cymbidiums will be featured prominently, but there will also be masses of the better-known
cattleyas and displays of the so-called botanicals. And there will be demonstrations of the propagating technique, displays on diseases and pests,
and exhibits of corsages and arrangements—everything you need to know to start this atrium. Also, watch for next Sunday’s issue of Home magazine
which will carry a feature story in color on orchids. Produced by Dr. Robert E. Atkinson/Illustrated by William V. Brace.
A few days later, April 14, the Times ran a story featuring one of our long-time members, Mary Ann Barnett (we will have more about
the Barnetts at a later date).
Pair Ready for Orchid Conference
Newport Beach – Members of the Orange County Orchid Society participating in the fifth World Orchid Conferens and Show at Long Beach Arena today
through Sunday, Paril 17, will include Fire Chief Jan Briscoe of Newport Beach and Mrs. Briscoe.
Raising orchids in their two greenhouses is a hobby of Mr. and Mrs. Briscoe.
Mrs. Briscoe enjoys a wide reputation of having won many honors for her use of orchids in arrangements. She says that her chief love is arranging
orchids in artistic designs for enjoyment in the home and for wearing as corsages.
Mrs. Briscoe will be exhibiting arrangements at the Long Beach Show.
Another prominent orchid-growing couple is Mr. and Mrs. P. G. Barnett, also of Newport Beach. The Barnetts enjoy their private collection of
1,000 cattleyas, among which is the renowned white cattleya, the Mary Ann Barnett, named for Mrs. Barnett. It was bred at the B. O. Bracy Co. Orchid
Range in Santa Ana.
A blooming Mary Ann Barnett plant will be featured in the Barnett display at the Long Beach show, together with an oil portrait in which the
Over $1 million worth of orchids will be on display at the World Orchid Show. International competition will be judges by a panel of 200 judges
from throughout the world.
Robert Green of Garden Grove, president of the Orange County Orchid Society, said the show affords “a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity to view such
beauty in exotic settings.”
The Orange County Society will have a display at the show open to the public for a fee. The Orange County group has Sidney Lowery, Santa Ana, and
Vince Scoggins, Huntington Beach, as vice presidents; Peg McBurney, Yorba Linda, secretary; Walter Belville, Buena Park, treasurer, and Mrs. Robert
Potter, Huntington Beach, membership chairman.
The Orange County Society meets each third Monday at 7:30 p.m. at the Orange County Farm Bureau, 1913 Chapman Ave., Orange.
Finally, a long article with photographs of many orchids, presumably from the show, appeared on Sunday, April 17. As digitized in black and white, the
photos are not suitable for display here, but we think they should still be in the photo archives of the Los Angeles Times, and we can probably
find other pictures of the same varieties. We will add them here if and when we find them, but for now, we will replace them with newer
pictures of the same plants! The article touches on many aspects of orchid history in
Southern California, to which we hope we can return later. Here it is, errors and all, with our added footnotes:
Orchids: the reward is worth the effort
By Dr. Robert E. Atkinson. The World Orchid Congress1 and Show now being held at the Long Beach Arena—it
closes today at 6 p.m.—has focused attention
once more on the question: Are orchids practical for the average home gardener? The answer to that depends on what kind of orchid you have in mind.
Cypripediums2 are as easy to grow as African violets and need about the same care. Cymbidiums can be grown out
of doors in the milder parts of our area. Cattleyas, however, require an atrium or greenhouse where humidity can be provided on hot, desert-dry days.
The photograph above3 shows a group of the
latter, which are, reading from the left, Laeliocattleya Jim Frazer, Cattleya intermediatee Aquinii; Laeliocattleya Lemon Drop, a
miniature, and L.c. Gypsy Dance.
Generally accepted as the easiest to grow of all of orchids is the Lady Slipper, usually called “cyp,” short for Cypripedium. However, these
much-hybridized natives of Assam are classified as Paphiopedilum. They are distant relatives of our native lady slipper or moccasin flower.
“Cyps” are having a renaissance and the trend is away from the speckled types toward the lighter yellow-green and the red or mulberry colors.
P. fairrieanum is a dwarf species, while Golden Acres is one of the newest varieties. Orchid growers like “cyps” because they bloom before
cymbidiums and when most cattleyas have faced, but their popularity is due chiefly to their freedom from pests and diseases, their adaptability
to varied conditions of light, temperature and humidity, and to their compactness, free-blooming habits and long-lasting flowers.
Cymbidiums come from the Himalayas where they grow about 5,000 to 7,000 feet. At these elevations near the equator the sunlight is intense, and
the nights are cool and the days are mild. No wonder they thrive outdoors in California! The miniatures are even more adaptable and, unlike the
standard cymbidiums, do not require cold fall nights to bloom. All they need is half shade, plenty of water and mild fertilizer. Pumander, the
developed in 1944, was one of the first miniatures. Korintji and Pipeta (1962) have the added attraction of fragrance.
Brassia verrucosa is one of the best known of the “spider” orchids. It is popular with all collectors because of its fragrance and the ease with
which it is brought into bloom. It is a native of Mexico and must be kept under the same conditions as a cattleya.
The miniature Cattleya loddiaca is one of the bifoliates with heads of delicate flowers which are 2 ½ to 3 inches across. It was derived from a
cross between Cattleya loddigesii with white flowers and C. aurantiaca5
with bright orange flowers. Yellows were expected from this combination but
most are pink.
Southern California breeders have led the orchid world in such advances as cymbidium breeding, the development of miniatures, and the white bifoliate
cattleyas. They are at the forefront in the latest craze for red orchids and showed the way in the early development of yellow, bronze and purple
Back in 1922 the variety Alexandria Westenbirt6 turned up in the nursery of A. G. Alexander in Tetbury, England,
and great things have been happening
ever since to cymbidiums, mostly in Southern California. It produced such hybrids as Jungfrau and Rosanna Pinkie, latter the envy of every hybridist
the world over. It first bloomed at Exbury, the Rothchild’s English estate, and was acquired by Dos Pueblos Orchid Co. of Goleta in 1953. Progeny of
this sire include Balkis, Nam Khan and many others. Offspring of Balkis include the sterile triploid, Lillian Stewart, the world’s most highly honored
orchid of all time.7 Other tetraploid stud plants, Babylon and Pauwelsii, have been used by cymbidium breeders
to create highly awarded progeny. In the
development of miniature cymbidiums, the leaders have been Fred Stewart, Mrs. Emma D. Menninger, Dr. Lee Lenz, Mary Bea Ireland, and the late Arno Bowers
and many others, all of Southern California. Miniature cattleyas, on the other hand, have been promted chifely through the interest of Ernest Hetherington
ot Stewart’s Orchids.
Armacost and Royston of West Los Angeles took a lead in breeding cattleyas. Before World War II, B. O. Bracey was in charge of the breeding program
and trained many of the men who became famous for their crosses, including Oscar Kirsch and William Kirsch of Honolulu, Hetherington, Joe Ozella of
Hawthorne and Joe Hampton of Dos Pueblos.
In 1952 Ben Bracey formed his own company and developed L.c. Bonanza, one of the greatest orchids of all time. Ozella developed L.c. Lee Langford
and other yellow and bronze varieties before he died in 1957. Joe Urmston, who died the same year, is best known for his work on the effect of length
of day on flowering. He developed the methods of blooming cattleyas under lights used in commercial flower production.
Recently the white bifoliates, called “wedding whites” have been extremely popular with florists. The while exhibition cattleyas, derived from Bowbells
and Bob Betts, outstanding parents of choice flowers, also came into prominence. The “semi-albas,” white cattleyas with a purple or red lip, have
received renewed interest with Leo Holquin of Armacost and Royston showing the say. The search for red cattleyas started by Ozella has engaged the
talents of such orchidists as Philip Ilsley of Beverly Hills and Frank Fordyce of Carlsbad, as well as Hetherington. No crosses have excited orchid
growers everywhere as much as the red Sophronitis and Potinara hybrids and the offspring of bronze and dark red-lavender cattleyas. Red strans issue
from parents with no red in their ancestry and geneticists are busy explaining this inexplicable phenomenon.
1.The event was officially a World Orchid Conference, perhaps to distinguish it from the series of Western Orchid
2.In 1966, the plants classified by botanists as Paphiopedilum were still called Cypripedium by the American
Orchid Society, the Royal Horticultural Society, and most growers.
3.So far, we don't have a photograph of all of these plants. Lc. Jim Frazer is now known as C. Jim Frazer
(C. Labi-Royal x
Joseph Hampton), no picture has been found. C. intermedia aquinii is a well-known splash-petal variety. Lc. Lemon Drop is now a Cattlianthe
due to recent changes in taxonomy. Lc. Gypsy Dance is not registered, but it is possible this was an error for (now Cattleya) Gypsy Queen,
then a newly-registered hybrid by B. O. Bracey, C. Bonanza x C. percivaliana, for which we could find no picture.
5.Cattleya aurantiaca is now classified as Guarianthe aurantiaca, and the hybrid with C. loddigesii
is therefore now known as Cattlianthe Loddiaca.
6.The plant is correctly called Cymbidium Alexanderi 'Westonbirt'.
7.Was Cymbidium Lillian Stewart then the most highly awarded orchid? Within the realm of the AOS, possibly it was,
but we strongly suspect it might have been surpassed even then by some of the progeny of Alexanderi 'Westonbirt', or perhaps by some of the Paphiopedilum
species. Today, there are certainly many hybrids and species with more awards than Lillian Stewart, but we don't know which one holds the record. Perhaps
we should ask the Guinness organization to investigate this question.
A Blast from the Past: 1950 — Our First Bash!
The story of our first big party, on December 20, 1950, was reported in The
Independent on Sunday, December 24, with several pictures — two of the "lovely Claire Hammel", elegantly dressed and with South Coast
Orchid Society corsages to accent her beautifully tailored outfits from Dinel's Feminine Apparel in downtown Long Beach (long gone, and perhaps that's
why nobody dresses like this anymore?), and a photo of our society's first President, the "oil man" Paul N. Baker.
(From The Independent, Long Beach, California, Sunday, December 24, 1950)
Orchid Growers’ Contest
By BESS SETTLE.
In her hair she wore a gorgeous brassolaeliacattleya, Decorating her wrist was a dendrobium Formosum giganteum . . . and adorning her bodice was
an oncidium zygopetalum.
If you don’t know what the gal was wearing just ask her. She will probably say “orchids to you.”
Your reporter, who can scarcely distinguish a phaleanopsis from a dendrobium, found herself slightly confused amid an ocean of orchids Wednesday
night in Bowling Green Clubhouse, Recreation Park, where the South Coast Orchid Society staged a meeting and grower’s contest. Head of the society
is Paul N. Baker of Long Beach who lives at 424 Windslow Ave., and as a hobby raises his choicest blooms in a glass house at 370 E. 37th St.
But as the Bard of Avon so aptly put it, “What’s in a name?” To the uninitiated a cyripedium cymatodes is just as pretty as a cypripedium
delanatti . . . it’s all a matter of personal preference.
Any orchid grower will tell you that there are 15,000 varieties. Fortunately for you and me most of them have common names such as
“Big Festivity” designated by the grower as “brassolaeliacattleya.”
Wednesday night’s session was in the form of a contest for plant growers and corrsage making. Many of the amateur growers also excel
in the art of making bouquets and corsages of their dainty blossoms.
Winner of the grand prize was Ann MacQuiddy of Compton. First prize for the best cattleya went to Genevieve Toy of Gardena; second prize
to Nora Pino of Torrance and third to Mrs. Morris Holmquist of Long Beach.
Awards for making orchid corsages went to Mrs. Paul N. Baker, Long Beach; Mrs. Charles Atkinson, Balboa, and Nora Pino of Torrance. Mrs.
Baker won all three honorable mention awards for making corsages.
Judges were Lillian Newman, Rosemary Short, Claire Hammel and Minka Zorka. Many members of the South Coast Orchid Society are also affiliated
with the Southern California Orchid Society and with the American Orchid Soceity at Harvard University.
During 1951, meetings of the South Coast Orchid Society will be conducted each fourth Monday night of the month in Woodland Clubhouse, Recreation Park.
The site of Mr. Baker's "glass house" turns out be the location of a big hole in the ground, intended, we think, for a Jewish senior housing development,
right across 37th Street from the Latter Day Saints church, just east of Long Beach Boulevard. Perhaps not coincidentally, the location is also close to the
Petroleum Club, where for decades South Coast Orchid Society held its annual banquet and installation of officers each January. Of the lovely Claire
Hammel, we haven't learned anything further, but we expect to spend some time on the internet searching digitized newpapers and Long Beach history sources.
We were lucky to have such an effective orchid spokesmodel.
Caption for the photo of our first President, Paul N. Baker, from The Independent:
BAKER’S BLOSSOMS—Oil and orchids are beautifully blended by Paul N. Baker, Long Beach oil man, who lives at 424 Winslow Ave.
Adjoining his place of business at 370 E. 37th St. he has a glass house where as a hobby he raises spectacularly beautiful
orchids. He is shown here surrounded by a few of his choicest specimens. He is president of the South Coast Orchid Society.
Mrs. Baker shares her husband’s enthusiasm and wins awards for her orchid corsages. (Independent Photo by Fred Wilson.)
More about our first spokesmodel: Born Claire Leonard in 1914 in Seattle, Mrs. Claire L. Hammel had worked as a model in Portland, Oregon.
She and her first husband Alvin
M. Hammel were active in a civic theater group in Portland in January, 1938, in the cast of Idiot's Delight, a popular comedy by Robert E. Sherwood. They were
parents of two children born in 1940 and 1944. Claire was interviewed in a Portland newspaper about being a "working girl" while being a housewife and raising two
children. By 1950, Claire was in Long Beach. We don't know what became of Mr. Hammel, but in 1957 she married a second time, in Las Vegas, to Cpt. Charles
Stanford ("Stan") Vose. He had served in World War II and continued in his military career. His children spend some of their school years in Seville, Spain
during his overseas assignments. By the 1980's, Stan and Claire were at Ft. Bliss, El Paso, Texas, and she worked as an artist there for many years. She died in 2000.
Her tombstone bears the inscription "Forever Beautiful".
More abour our first president: Paul Noble Baker was born in 1892 in El Modena, California. He served in the Navy during World War I.
He and his first wife Muriel W. Sheldon adopted two children. They lived in Long Beach at least as early as 1930. His second wife was Maude Audry Daume. They
were married in 1941. They had several children. During World War II they lived on Winslow Ave. in Long Beach, and Paul owned Shasta Petroleum Company, offices
at 370 E. 37th Street. He died in 1961. His widow Audry, whose skill at making orchid corsages was one of the things that got our society started, eventually
relocated to Arkansas, where she died in 1997. Some of their children are still living. As always, we would love to know more about our founding members!
South Coast Orchids Society newsletter masthead from 1958
About those corsages...
Recently our friend Brandon Tam discovered a trove of SCOS newsletters in the "orchid archive" at The
Huntington Botanical Center. Armed with our little iPhone, we spent a morning with Brandon in the basement of the Botanical Center and
photographed them. They have now been converted to pdf format and are included in the Newspapers link on
this web site. We were surprised to spot this motto on the newsletters from the 1950's and 60's: Orchids
are gracious living — wear them.
SCOS corsage materials: Oncidium tigrinum
Dendrobium formosum var. giganteum
A quick trip to the internet shows that orchid corsages aren't what they used to be. The popular flowers now are Cymbidium, Dendrobium,
and Phalaenopsis, especially the lurid, dye-infused "blue" ones. We suspect the lovely Claire Hammel, Mrs. Baker, and all the rest of the founding
members of South Coast Orchid Society had better taste — and they knew how to wear their flowers!
We are grateful to Art Chadwick of Chadwick & Son Orchids, Inc. for some pictures of
Cattleya corsages done right. The archives are full of pictures of American First Ladies on inauguration day, but as that happens in January, everyone
is shown wearing bulky coats and, usually, furs. The pictures usually don't reveal very much about the orchids, either, except that they were numerous! Perhaps
more interesting is the picture of modern corsages in the style favored by First Lady Edith Wilson, proving it can still be done, and in good taste.
But we saved the best for last: the "travel corsage" fashion plate from the 1940's is definitely high style. The corsage uses the very best quality of
Cattleya hybrids and complements the ensemble. We're not so sure about the minks draped around the model's neck, though, complete with their little heads, claws, and
toothy grins. When you were very young, and some big-city aunt visited you wearing one of these little varmints, didn't it creep you out? Where was the model
supposed to be traveling from? Maybe a weekend at a hunting lodge? Are you sure there isn't a shotgun hiding somewhere in the picture?